 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,418 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 6 July 2024 by Cabrils (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 4 July 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by DoubleGrazing 2 months ago. | |
Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPROF) but presently it is not clear that it does. As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that many of the references are not from sources that are considered reliable for establishing notability and should be removed (including articles by Pamaym as opposed to articles, from reliable sources, about him). Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like a CV, which Wikipedia is not. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NPROF criteria #3, because XXXXX"). You may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 04:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please remove all inline external links from body text; convert to citations where relevant. There should be no links pointing to external resources until the footnotes in the 'References' section. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The sources are insufficient for establishing notability per WP:GNG. If WP:NACADEMIC notability is being claimed instead, please make it clear which of the eight criteria is met, and what evidence supports this.In articles on living people, every material statement, anything potentially contentious, and all private personal details must be clearly supported by inline citations to reliable published sources, or else removed. Currently only the 'Research' section is referenced. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Payam A. Gammage | |
|---|---|
| Born | 1987 (36 years old) Exeter, United Kingdom |
| Alma mater | University College London (M.Sci.) University of Cambridge (Ph.D.) |
| Known for | mitochondrial genome editing, mitochondrial genetics of cancer |
| Awards | European Research Council Starting Grant
National Cancer Institute R37 MERIT Award European Molecular Biology Organistaion (EMBO) Young Investigator Award |
| Scientific career | |
| Fields | Mitochondrial genome engineering, mitochondrial genetics, cancer metabolism, tumour biology |
| Institutions | University of Cambridge
University of Glasgow Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute |
| Website | https://www.crukscotlandinstitute.ac.uk/cruk-si-research/cruk-si-research-groups/payam-gammage-mitochondrial-oncogenetics.html |
Payam A. Gammage is a British scientist, Group Leader at the Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute (Formerly Beatson Institute) and Professor of Mitochondrial Biology at the University of Glasgow.
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.