Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,267 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 25 February 2020 by DocumentError (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Abbreviation | PhilSAN |
---|---|
Founded | June 28, 1988 |
Founded at | Makati, Philippines |
Type | Professional Association |
Location |
|
President | Amelita Gabriela R. Resontoc-Galban |
Philippine Society of Animal Nutritionists, abbreviated as PhilSAN, is a non-profit Philippine professional organization established in Makati, Philippines on June 28, 1988.[1] It is the only professional animal nutritionists organization in the Philippines.[2] The organization is generally involved with local and international animal food production.[3][4]
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.