Submission declined on 15 September 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 23 April 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 23 January 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 9 months ago.
| |
Comment: Per WP:ORG, we need to see significant coverage, directly of the school itself, in multiple secondary sources that are both reliable and independent. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Despite repeated resubmissions, there are still no sources that speak to notability. I'd strongly suggest the author read WP:My first article and WP:NSCHOOL. References to notable alumni are to verify the person's connection to the school and do not speak to notability at all. See WP:INHERIT. And, as noted in the previous comment, there are bundled citations. Please don't do that. The entire body of the article, excepting the Notable alumni section, is unsourced. Every paragraph should have at least one citation, and in order to show notability, a citation must be to a source that is independent, secondary and reliable. Please do not resubmit until the noted deficiencies are corrected. 4.37.252.50 (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please don't lump together several sources into a single citation, like has been done with cite #2. Each citation should cite a single source, which clearly supports the statement against which it is cited. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Pope Pius XI Higher Secondary School, located in Kattanam, Alappuzha, Kerala, offers education for students from classes V to XII (5 to 12).[1]. Established in 1934[2], the school operates under the affiliation and aid of the Government of Kerala through the Department of General Education[3]
- ^ "POPE PIOUS XI HSS BHARANIKKAVU - Kattanam District Alappuzha (Kerala)". schools.org.in. Retrieved 2024-01-23.
- ^ "പോപ്പ് പയസ് സ്കൂൾ നവതിയാഘോഷങ്ങൾ സമാപിച്ചു". Newspaper. 2024-01-22. Retrieved 2024-01-25.
- ^ "schoolist". www.dhsekerala.gov.in. Retrieved 2024-01-23.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.