| Submission declined on 17 September 2024 by Youknowwhoistheman (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 16 September 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 5 days ago. | |
Comment: Wikipedia cannot be a source, see WP:CIRCULAR. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Poul Dedenroth-Schou | |
|---|---|
| Born | 6 August 1943 Næstved, Denmark |
| Nationality | Danish |
| Education | University of Copenhagen |
| Occupation(s) | Museum Director, Historian, Art Historian, Restoration Expert, Knight of the Order of Dannebrog |
| Employer | Retired from Koldinghus |
Poul Dedenroth-Schou (born August 6, 1943) is a Danish historian and former director of the Danish Royal Castle of Koldinghus, at Kolding, Denmark. He played a pivotal role in restoring the derelict castle ruin and transforming the castle museum into a major cultural and historical landmark in Denmark.[1] [2].
- ^ "He knows Kolding's history inside and out (Han kender Koldings historie ud og ind)". Jyllands-Posten. 2018-01-30. Retrieved 2024-09-18.
- ^ "Poul Dedenroth-Schou retired after 37 years at Koldinghus (in Danish)". Ugeavisen. 2021-12-20. Retrieved 2024-09-16.