Submission declined on 19 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |
Submission declined on 16 November 2023 by Cabrils (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by Cabrils 11 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 11 November 2023 by Pbritti (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by Pbritti 12 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 8 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Vanderwaalforces 12 months ago. |
Dr. Pravir Malik is a systems thinker. In his doctoral dissertation on a mathematics of innovation in complex adaptive systems he created a top-down in contrast to the already existing bottom-up mathematics for complex systems[1]. The bottom-up approach has been the result of pioneering work by institutions such as MIT and Santa Fe Institute and has amply proven itself in a vast range of use-cases over the decades. By contrast the top-down approach has still to be adequately adopted and applied. Early signs of practical usefulness have appeared in areas such as development of pricing systems[2], emotional intelligence systems[3][4], AI[5], and quantum systems[6][7][8][9][10]. Early theoretical applications exist in genetics[11], pharmaceutical technology[12], nanotechnology[13], space sciences[14], and computational theory[15].