| Submission declined on 21 August 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 17 March 2024 by David Gerard (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by David Gerard 6 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 15 March 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 7 months ago.
| |
Comment: IMDB, express.co.uk, and LinkedIn are not reliable sources. C F A 💬 18:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Sourcing issues not addressed. Too many primary sources, too many cryptocurrency sources. Strongly suggest you write a version entirely based only on mainstream RSes with no cryptocurrency media - David Gerard (talk) 10:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Summary of the initial article discussion at David Gerard's talkpage thread.
 Logo | |
| Original author(s) | Richard Heart |
|---|---|
| Initial release | 13 May 2023 |
| Stable release | 3.2.0 (geth)[1] |
| Development status | Active |
| Software used | EVM 1 Bytecode |
| Written in | Go, Rust, C#, C++, Java, Python, Nim, TypeScript |
| Operating system | Unix, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Platform | x86-64, ARM |
| Available in | Multilingual, but primarily English |
| Type | Distributed computing |
| License | Open-source licenses |
| Active hosts | 47,685 nodes (12 Oct 2024) |
| Website | pulsechain |
PulseChain is a decentralized Layer-1 blockchain with smart contract functionality, originally founded and initiated by Richard Heart.[2] Pulse (Abbreviation: PLS[a]) is the native cryptocurrency of the platform.[3] [4]
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).