 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,688 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 30 May 2024 by Liance (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 17 May 2024 by Jamiebuba (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Jamiebuba 3 months ago. | |
Comment: Promotional tone still not addressed from previous declines and is pervasive throughout article ~Liancetalk 18:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Qiu Aici (Chinese: 邱爱慈; November 22, 1941 - present) is a scientist in the field of high-current pulsed particle beam accelerators and high-power pulse technology in China.[1] She is an Academician of Chinese Academy of Engineering, a researcher, doctoral supervisor, and chief engineer at the Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, and the dean of the School of Electrical Engineering at Xi’an Jiaotong University. [2]
Qiu Aici participated in the development and improvement of China’s first high-impedance electron beam accelerator. She was also responsible for the development of China’s low-impedance pulsed electron beam accelerator “Flash No. 2” with the strongest beam current of 1MA. Moreover, she presided over many other scientific research projects including “Qiangguang No. 1”, “Fast Z-Pinch Physics and Its Pulse Power Driving Source Technology” and “High-Power Ion Beam Generation and Application.”[2]
- ^ "Qiu Aici's Page". Chinese Academy of Engineering. Retrieved 2024-05-16.
- ^ a b "Faculty Profile". Xi’an Jiaotong University. Retrieved 2024-05-16.