 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,689 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 24 July 2024 by Cabrils (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 20 July 2024 by Youknowwhoistheman (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Youknowwhoistheman 49 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 18 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by SafariScribe 50 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 17 July 2024 by Curb Safe Charmer (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Curb Safe Charmer 52 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 17 July 2024 by Bluethricecreamman (talk). This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information. Declined by Bluethricecreamman 52 days ago. | |
Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPROF, WP:AUTHOR) but presently it is not clear that it does. As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that many of the references are not from sources that are considered reliable for establishing notability. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NPROF criteria #3, because XXXXX"). Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 08:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: It is not helpful for the URL to take the reader to the home page of an institution's website where there's no mention of Pachori.Please update the URLs in the references to take the reader to a page where they can verify the statement that the reference is there to support. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:56, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Is WP:RESUME still. Saw the previous AfD comment.I think this person probably is notable for WP:ACADEMIC by citation count, but the sourcing is not enough in this article.Please find sourcing that is independent of the author (not written by the author). Sources 10-19 are not useful as references and should be put into a bibliography or works page. see Malcolm_Gladwell#Bibliography Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Ram Bilas Pachori (born 1979), a Senior Member of the IEEE, is a professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology Indore, India[1]
[2]. His research interests include signal processing, image processing, biomedical signal processing, non-stationary signal processing, speech signal processing, brain-computer interfaces, machine learning, artificial intelligence and Internet of things in healthcare.[3][4]
- ^ "Title of the Talk". IIT Mandi. Retrieved July 22, 2024.
- ^ "Faculty - Electrical Engineering". Indian Institute of Technology Indore. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
- ^ "Dr. Ram Bilas Pachori's Personal Webpage". Indian Institute of Technology Indore. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
- ^ "Speakers - ICSC21 Conference". Jaypee Institute of Information Technology. Retrieved July 22, 2024.
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.