Submission declined on 14 July 2024 by S0091 (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 24 June 2024 by Wiiformii (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Wiiformii 29 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 24 June 2024 by Ratnahastin (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Ratnahastin 29 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 23 June 2024 by Chaotic Enby (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Chaotic Enby 30 days ago. | |
Comment: In addition, many of the sources are not reliable (blogs like Afrik21), others are press releases, interviews or based on what Renewvia has said/written about itself so are primary and not independent. Other sources are trade publications which generally cannot be used to establish notability because they exist to promote an industry and have a limited audience. If resubmitted with substantial improvement, the draft may be rejected. S0091 (talk) 17:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (June 2024) |
| Industry | Energy industry |
|---|---|
| Headquarters | Atlanta, Georgia, United States |
| Products | Commercial and rural mini-grid solar and wind projects |
| Website | https://www.renewvia.com/ |
Renewvia Energy Corporation is an American renewable energy company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Founded in 2008, the company specializes in designing, installing, owning, and operating solar power systems for commercial and community applications. Renewvia provides turnkey solar installation, integrated financing, and solar consulting services across the United States and in several African countries.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.