Draft:Rita Singh

Submission declined on 9 October 2024 by Bluethricecreamman (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject) reliable secondary independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Bluethricecreamman 25 days ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here.

Submission declined on 6 February 2024 by Ldm1954 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Ldm1954 8 months ago.

Submission declined on 30 January 2024 by User4edits (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by User4edits 9 months ago.

• Comment: no real changes since LDM1954 declined.
  H-index as per Web of Science is 11. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 00:32, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: The previous declination history was removed; I have added it back. The page was also draftified after being moved to main after two rejections. Since I reviewed it before I won't again, but I don't see major improvements. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Unfortunately you have misunderstood the notability requirements. Adding a few references won't help, she would need a major awards from a large national society or similar. It is rare for someone below full Professor to come close to the notability criteria. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Most citations are self-works/original research journal articles by the individual. I do not find any notability. Nor any WP:SIGCOV of whatsoever. User4edits (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libelous. Find sources: "Rita Singh" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article's use of external links may not follow Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Please improve this article by removing excessive or inappropriate external links, and converting useful links where appropriate into footnote references. (February 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. Please remove or replace such wording and instead of making proclamations about a subject's importance, use facts and attribution to demonstrate that importance. (February 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) The topic of this draft may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. Notability should be established before publishing this draft or submitting it via the articles for creation process. Find sources: "Rita Singh" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Rita Singh" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Rita Singh is a computer scientist known for her work in the algorithmic dimensions of voice recognition technologies and the application of artificial intelligence in voice forensics.^[1] She holds a position as a Research Faculty in the Language Technologies Institute of the School of Computer Science of Carnegie Mellon University. She led global conversations at the World Economic Forum on topics related to voice technologies.^[2][3] Singh is a founder and technology director of Center for Voice Intelligence and Security (CVIS), an organization dedicated to pioneering developments in voice technology and its security implications.^[4]