 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 5 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,004 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 28 October 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: A honorary professorship doesn't indicate notability. Also note that Wikipedia doesn't know the principle of inherited notability, i.e., it doesn't matter who confirmed the subjects scientific discoveries or whom the subject collaborated with. Please make sure that the text is based on reliable secondary sources; the text is almost exclusively based on what the subject says about himself, and "Congress, The Library of". Maybe, you should cite more "Congress, the Library of", I reckon he is a knowledgeable person. (In case this isn't obvious: I'm joking. Please fix your citations if you deem the subject sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia!) --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 18:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Roberto G. Carbone (born in Genoa, Italy - 6 September 1954) is an Italian scientist and clinician,
studying the mechanisms and treatment of pulmonary fibrosis such as extracellular matrix, global idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis genome, discoverer of pulmonary hypertension as the most important cause of mortality in cardiopulmonary diseases, lung cancer mechanisms as confirmed by Prof. Robert P. Baughman, University of Cincinnati with whom he studied the pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy of sarcoidosis.
Furthermore he collaborated with D. Geraint James regarding the treatment of sarcoidosis. He also an expert in lung transplantation, asbestosis and mesothelioma.[1] He also studied the role of neuropeptides (neurotensin) in asthma adrenergic and recently his research focused on stem cells post acute myocardial infarction(AMI).[2]
- ^ Carbone, Roberto G. "Roberto G. Carbone Sciprofiles".
- ^ Carbone, Roberto G. "Roberto G. Carbone IGmin".