| Submission declined on 7 September 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 4 August 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CFA 34 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 2 November 2023 by GraziePrego (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by GraziePrego 10 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 13 June 2023 by DreamRimmer (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by DreamRimmer 14 months ago. | |
Comment: All of the sources cited in the article appear to be primary. To meet WP:GNG, detailed coverage in independent secondary sources is required. DreamRimmer (talk) 12:10, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Initiated discussion here with the WikiProject. Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 01:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Sant Isher Singh | |
|---|---|
| Born | Isher Singh 5 August 1905 |
| Died | 25 August 1975 (aged 70) |
| Cause of death | Natural Causes |
| Other names | Sant Ishar Singh Ji, Gulab Singh |
| Occupations |
|
| Organization | Rara Sahib |
| Known for | Gurdwara Karamsar Rara Sahib |
| Title | Sant |
| Predecessor | Sant Baba Attar Singh |
| Successor | Sant Baba Kishan Singh |
| Parents |
|
| Honours | Portrait in the Central Sikh Museum |
Sant Isher Singh Ji (August 26, 1905 – August 9, 1975) also known as Sant Ishar Singh Ji was a Sikh saint, preacher, singer and writer from the Rara Sahib region of Punjab, India.[1][2] He was born in Alowal, a small village in the Ropar district of Punjab, to Baba Ram Singh, a farmer, and Mata Rattan Kaur, a homemaker.[3][4][5]
- ^ "Gurdwara Karamsar Rara Sahib". Rara Sahib.
Sant Isher Singh Ji was born of Mata Ratan Kaur, in the household of Sardar Ram Singh Nambardar, on 5th August 1905 at village Allowal, district Patiala. The parents named their son Gulab Singh. Nobody knew that one day this "Gulab" (meaning rose) would spread his fragrance far and wide. He received the basic worldly education from the primary School of village 'Chulela'.
- ^ "Tracks by Sant Baba Ishar Singh (Rara Sahib)". SikhNet.
- ^ "Sant Baba Ishar Singh (Rara Sahib)". Sikh Net.
- ^ "Never look at anyone's faults - Bachan Sant Isher Singh Ji Rara Sahib". Nihung Santhia. 6 August 2020.
- ^ Singh, Giani Mehar (2010). Nau Rattan (in Punjabi). Lahore Book Shop. p. 300.