| Submission declined on 10 September 2024 by Paul W (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 3 September 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 13 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 2 September 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 14 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 31 August 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by DoubleGrazing 16 days ago. | |
Comment: No substantial coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources. Submitter making little effort to improve the article and demonstrate the subject's notability (please note that, in Wikipedia, notable songs or notable plays would have their own articles about them - it appears these songs and plays are only notable to the draft's author). If this is submitted again without significant improvement, it should be rejected with no option to resubmit. Paul W (talk) 14:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I can't see anything here to suggest that they are notable? Theroadislong (talk) 14:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The first source is cited in the lead section, but does't really support anything in this draft, let alone contribute anything towards notability, as it's only a short promo piece without a byline and in the voice of the subject himself.The entire 'Early life and education' section is unreferenced.The remaining 27 citations all appear in career sections, so presumably verify the various works listed (listed without providing any context or details), without establishing notability per WP:GNG of the actual person.Speaking of notability, it's far from clear on what basis this is being claimed – musician, writer, or something else?In conclusion, much work remains to be done. Including getting rid of the odd boldface, as already pointed out. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please remove weird bolding Theroadislong (talk) 14:47, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (September 2024) |
Shamim Hossen | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Sub-Editor of the Daily Jugantor | |
| Personal details | |
| Born | 10 August 1992 Jessore |
| Alma mater | Jagannath University |
| Occupation | journalist |
Shamim Hossen is a Bangladeshi journalist, songwriter, singer and director, working as a senior sub-editor of the sports department of the daily Jugantor.[1]
- ^ "ইসলামি গান নিয়ে হাজির শামীম". RTV Online (in Bengali). Retrieved 2024-08-31.