 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,297 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 16 September 2024 by Guessitsavis (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 11 September 2024 by OhHaiMark (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by OhHaiMark 10 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 9 September 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Bonadea 12 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 5 September 2024 by Youknowwhoistheman (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Youknowwhoistheman 16 days ago. | |
Comment: Your use of inline citations has definitely improved, but I'd like to see a bit more editing so that it falls under our expectations of neutrality. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 09:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The draft would need to be almost completely re-written in order to become neutral in tone. bonadea contributions talk 10:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Srabana Misra Bhagabaty | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | Guwahati, Assam, India |
| Citizenship | Indian |
| Education | MBBS, MD |
| Awards | World Health Organization’s South East Asia Director’s Special Recognition Award Healthcare Excellence Award |
Srabana Misra Bhagabaty, is an Indian medical doctor and preventive oncologist. She was honoured by the World Health Organization, in 2022, by bestowing on her the South East Asia Director’s Special Recognition Award [1]. for his contributions in tobacco control in the Southeast Asia region. She was also honoured with Healthcare Excellence Award [2] in 2019 for her contribution in improving rural healthcare in Assam. She is currently leading the Preventive Oncology [3] Department at Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, which is affiliated with the Tata Memorial Centre and receives support from the Government of India’s Department of Atomic Energy.
- ^ WHO's, World Health Organisation. "World No Tobacco Day 2022". WHO. World Health Organization. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
- ^ SDD, Sentinel Digital Desk (12 February 2019). "Healthcare Excellence Award For B Borooah Cancer Institute". Healthcare Excellence Award For B Borooah Cancer Institute. The Sentinel. Retrieved 13 September 2024.
- ^ BBCI, Dr. Bhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute. "Faculty Details". bbcionline. BBCI. Retrieved 17 September 2024.