| Submission declined on 20 October 2024 by Snowman304 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 27 May 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 5 months ago. | |
Comment: Seems quite notable, but a lot of unreferenced information. The paragraphs with one citation at the end gives the appearance of summarizing an entire book/article. Page numbers would help editors find and verify information.Maybe divide his work between WLSH and other projects (e.g., Medicare)?A few of his major publications in a "Publications" section would also be helpful.I would move the education information to a section called "Early life and education" or something. Snowman304|talk 21:35, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Notable but needs refs, thank you Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Largely lacking WP:Inline citations, inappropriate WP:External links microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 15:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Stanley L. Inhorn was Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where he also served as Director of the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene (WSLH) on the UW campus. A graduate of Cleveland's Western Reserve University (later renamed Case Western Reserve University) and Columbia University Medical School, Inhorn moved to Madison in 1953 to pursue an internship and residency in pathology before being appointed Assistant Professor of Pathology and Assistant Director of the WSLH in 1960. He became Director of the WSLH in 1966, a position he held until 1979, when he was asked by the UW Medical School to create a Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.