 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,266 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 12 November 2024 by Timtrent (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: What was the point of resubmitting with unreferenced sections? You have a total paucity of references for the facts you assert. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:23, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: While I think Lucero may pass WP:BIO this draft does not yet demonstrate that. It has the feel of a magazine article praising him rather than a neutral Wikipedia article.In addition there are insufficient references. Please look at WP:NCREATIVE to see what needs to be done to assert and verify his notability 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:12, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
George Ian Lucero, better known as Taipan Lucero, is a Filipino calligrapher, designer, and cultural advocate, known for founding CalligraFilipino, an initiative that integrates pre-colonial Filipino script with traditional cultural elements. His work combines the script of Baybayin with influences from traditional Filipino art and jewelry, creating a visual style that draws on motifs such as the Maranao Okir, the Sarimanok, the Kulintang pattern, and the Lingling-o charm from the Cordilleras.[1]