 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,741 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 30 May 2024 by Mdann52 (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 20 May 2024 by Notcharizard (talk). Declined by Notcharizard 2 months ago. | |
Comment: Hi! I have added links to other relevant Wikipedia articles as instructed. It sounds like I need help with the tone of this entry, and if you'd ever have time Mdann52 (talk) I could definitely use specific advice. I'm a newspaper journalist, so every line of this should have a citation to an independent newspaper, book, dissertation, academic archive or website source. I have also included the relevant documents for download at https://truehousecommunity.com/reference-files/ so that everything can be independently verified. My goal is the same as yours: to create a neutral representation of this subject. However, I suspect what might be contributing to your perception of it as an essay is all the material relating to "impression management" and the coverup of Jim Byrne's sexual abuse. There are cited documents that describe the sexual abuse and the part on impression management is cited directly from an academic book called "The Catholic Charismatics" (which can be read here: https://truehousecommunity.com/files/The%20Catholic%20Charismatics%20(chapter%206).pdf). The reason I included both of those topics is because they are directly relevant to True House's collapse and the wider significance that True House plays in the Catholic Charismatic Renewal. I am ok with removing them if you feel that they prevent a neutral tone, but I feel the citations are independent and crucial for readers to understand the context of events. -Pete
- Comment: I think the subject meets WP:GNG, however the current writing style is not keeping with Wikipedia and reads more like an essay on the subject rather than an encyclopaedic article. The article also is entirely unlinked from others, and we would expect some links to other articles on Wikipedia. It's a good start, but it also needs some serious editing before this is ready as an article. Mdann52 (talk) 04:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: note to reviewers, this is not a copyright infringement, ticket:2024051710001172 applies. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)