| Submission declined on 2 October 2024 by Thilsebatti (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 11 May 2024 by Maliner (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Maliner 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 27 April 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 5 November 2023 by CNMall41 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CNMall41 12 months ago. | |
Comment: Not clear how they pass WP:NWRITER? Theroadislong (talk) 06:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Looking at the dates on the references, the similarities in tone and writing style, they fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA and cannot be used to establish notability. If there is coverage out there that covers him more in-depth (I could not find any in a quick search), feel free to ping me here or leave a message on my talk page and I will come back to review. Given the history of the page creation, I would ask that you also review WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable. CNMall41 (talk) 08:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, talk, for pointing out the concerns regarding WP:NWRITER. I have updated the draft to include more comprehensive and independent sources that provide substantial coverage of Vaibhav Palhade’s work. These sources offer detailed reporting and analysis, demonstrating his notability. Please review the revised draft and let me know if any further changes are needed. I appreciate your feedback and am open to any additional suggestions.
Thank you, talk, for your review and feedback. I have updated the draft with a more diverse set of independent sources and ensured they meet notability criteria. I've also reviewed and adhered to WP:COI and WP:PAID guidelines. Please review the updated draft and let me know if further revisions are needed. Feel free to reach out on my talk page for additional discussion. Thank you for your assistance
Vaibhav Palhade | |
|---|---|
| Born | October 12, 1998 Akola, Maharashtra, India |
| Nationality | Indian |
| Occupation(s) | Filmmaker, Author |
| Years active | 2020–present |
| Notable work | 72 Rupayacha Paus, Saajna Re: A Lifelong Journey of Finding Her |
Vaibhav Palhade (born October 12, 1998, in Akola, Maharashtra) is an Indian filmmaker and author. He is known for his work in Indian cinema and literature, particularly in the Marathi language.[1][2]
- ^ Chaturvedi, Dilip (2022-08-16). "सामाजिक मुद्दों पर शॉर्टफिल्म बनाने वाले वैभव पल्हाडे का हॉलीवुड डेब्यू" [The Hollywood Debut of Vaibhav Palhade, who makes short films on social issues]. News24 (in Hindi). Retrieved 2024-04-27.
- ^ "अकोला का निर्देशक वैभव पल्हाडे सिनेमाई क्रिएशन के लिए '७२ रुपयों का पाऊस' ला रहे हैं" [Akola's Director Vaibhav Palhade Bringing '72 Rupees Rain' to Cinematic Creation]. Sakal (in Marathi). 2022-08-30. Retrieved 2024-08-16.