Submission declined on 3 September 2024 by IntentionallyDense (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 25 August 2024 by Utopes (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Utopes 2 months ago.
| |
Comment: An "about" page for a doctor is not a secondary, reliable source, and cannot be used as a notability-establishing reference. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
 |
The Vessel of Kim, also infundibulopelvic ligament of ovary accessory vessel, is a vein in the mesovarium that branches from the infundibulopelvic ligament (or suspensory ligament of ovary).[1] The Vessel of Kim is an important landmark in gynecologic surgery during an oophorectomy procedure. Proper cauterization of the Vessel of Kim is necessary when entering the pelvic sidewall as the small vessel can bleed and obstruct planes.
- ^ Craig, Morgan E.; Sudanagunta, Sneha; Billow, Megan (2023-07-24). "[Figure, Uterine Tubal Anatomy and Ligaments...]". www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 2024-08-24. [failed verification]
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.