| Submission declined on 29 June 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 23 January 2024 by Paul W (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Paul W 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 17 December 2023 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by DoubleGrazing 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 29 November 2023 by WikiOriginal-9 (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by WikiOriginal-9 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 27 November 2023 by QuantumRealm (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by QuantumRealm 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 17 November 2023 by WikiOriginal-9 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by WikiOriginal-9 7 months ago. | |
Comment: Subject may be notable (see WP:NPROF) but there are insufficient citations showing significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources (see WP:RS) - too much of the currently cited material is sourced from employing institutions associated with the subject). Tone is too much like a resume or Linkedin profile. Paul W (talk) 21:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Needs to be still more neutral and factual in tone:
"instrumental in establishing..."
,"meticulously analysed"
,"prominently featured"
– whose words are all these peacock terms?Also, this reads like a CV/resume. We don't need to know every single training course he's been on, or every minor award he's received. Focus on the things that make him notable. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Suggested improvements:1. The use of tables is not per MOS, please turn into lists instead.2. Remove all external links from body text. With the exception of one optional link in the infobox, there should be no external links before the 'References' section.3. Remove boldface from the 'Awards' section. Bold should not be used to highlight items.4. Section headings should be in *Sentence case*, not *Title Case*.-- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:52, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm not sure if this passes NACADEMIC or not but the tone needs to be more neutral. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 04:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (December 2023) |
Dr. Vijay Vasudev Pillay | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Other names | Dr. V.V. Pillay |
| Citizenship | Indian |
| Occupation(s) | Chief of Poison Control Centre and Professor & Head of Forensic Medicine & Medical Toxicology |
| Organization(s) | Amrita School of Medicine (Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham), Cochin |
| Known for | Clinical and Forensic Toxicology |
| Website | https://www.amrita.edu/faculty/dr-pillay-v-v/ |
Dr. Vijay Vasudev Pillay is a medical professional who is the Chief of Poison Control Centre at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Professor and Head of the Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS) in Cochin, Kerala, India.[1][2] In 2004, he established the Indian Society of Toxicology and was president for eight years.[1][2][3][4]
The Poison Control Centre at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences is officially recognized in the Global Directory of Poison Control Centres by the World Health Organization (WHO). Its affiliated Analytical Toxicology Laboratory is nationally accredited as a clinical toxicology facility, specialising in the examination of samples received from poisoned victims across the nation. To date, it has analysed a substantial number of samples.[1][3]
- ^ a b c "Faculty Bio". www.amrita.edu. 2023-10-19. Archived from the original on 2023-12-05. Retrieved 2023-10-19.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ a b "Dr. V.V. Pillay". Amrita Hospitals. 2023-11-28. Archived from the original on 2023-12-05. Retrieved 2023-11-28.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ a b Minj, Kimee (2022-08-17). "In Conversation with Dr. V. V. Pillay, Chief of Poison Control Centre & Head of Analytical Toxicology, AIMS, Cochin, Kerala". Legal Desire Media and Insights. Retrieved 2023-10-26.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
:2was invoked but never defined (see the help page).