Draft:Whey protein isolate

Submission declined on 17 September 2024 by DMacks (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by DMacks 2 days ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here.

Submission declined on 15 September 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 5 days ago.

Submission declined on 13 September 2024 by Reconrabbit (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Reconrabbit 6 days ago.

• Comment: Quick check turned up many deficient/failed/contradictory details and critical gaps in citation (see my edits for details). DMacks (talk) 12:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: The §Types section contradicts the §Production section: the former says there are two different types, but the latter includes both of them as steps in a unified process. DMacks (talk) 12:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: The first 3 sections are completely missing references. Also, the tone used is highly promotional. Reconrabbit 17:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) This article needs more reliable medical references for verification or relies too heavily on primary sources. Please review the contents of the article and add the appropriate references if you can. Unsourced or poorly sourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Whey protein isolate" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2024) This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view. (September 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Whey Protein Isolate (WPI) is a refined form of whey protein, a byproduct derived from the cheese-making process. WPI is known for its protein content, typically comprising 90% or more protein by weight, and contains minimal amounts of fat, carbohydrates, and lactose. It is commonly used as a dietary supplement to increase protein intake, particularly among athletes, bodybuilders, and individuals seeking to support muscle recovery and growth.^{[citation needed]}