 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,313 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 22 June 2024 by TheNuggeteer (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 10 January 2024 by CNMall41 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by CNMall41 8 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 29 November 2023 by InterstellarGamer12321 (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by InterstellarGamer12321 10 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 9 November 2023 by S5A-0043 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by S5A-0043 10 months ago. | |
Comment: As said by the last reviewers, the submission sounds like an advertisement, I propose removing the biased words like "award-winning" and remove unnecessary sentences the reader wont read. TheNuggeteer (talk) 03:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Thank you for declaring your affiliation to the topic. Upon closer look, there are some issues that need addressed prior to resubmission. The first is hyperlinks. These need to be removed and turned into references if they are supporting content. Here is an example of one I did for you so you have something to work from. Another issue is promotional tone. There is an entire section on "social enterprise" referenced to the official website of the topic. This is likely something they want to see, but you need to ask yourself if this is something that Wikipedia readers would like to know. If the preserve is noted for this, then it is likely covered in numerous reliable secondary sources so please use them instead of the company website. If it is not something it is widely known for, I would suggest removing it. Finally, the references seem to discuss the topic, but not in great detail. They basically talk about it in context with another topic. Are there any references you can provide which show that the preserve is covered in-depth or the primary focus of the article? CNMall41 (talk) 04:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Wildlife Wonders is a wildlife sanctuary in Apollo Bay on the Great Ocean Road in Victoria, Australia.
Its focus is on environmental conservation[1] and education. Wildlife Wonders is a social enterprise[2] supporting environmental conservation of the Otways region through the parent organisation, the Conservation Ecology Centre .
Wildlife Wonders is 5kms outside of Apollo Bay on the Great Ocean Road in Victoria, Australia
- ^ "Australian Charities and Not for Profit Commission". 6 March 2024. Retrieved 6 March 2024.
- ^ Collopy, Kristoffer (2021-06-06). "Ethical Blog Series #6 - Lizzie Corke OAM & Wildlife Wonders". Ethical Kollektiv. Retrieved 2024-02-07.