Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,252 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 10 October 2024 by Significa liberdade (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 12 August 2024 by LR.127 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by LR.127 3 months ago. |
Yunlong Richard Cao | |
---|---|
曹云龙 | |
Alma mater | Harvard University |
Known for | SARS-CoV-2 evolution |
Awards | Nature's 10 (2022) |
Scientific career | |
Fields | Immunology |
Institutions | Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center, Peking University |
Yunlong Richard Cao Chinese:曹云龙; pinyin: Cáo Yúnlóng) is a Chinese immunologist and assistant professor at Peking University's Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC).[1][2] Known for his work on SARS-CoV-2 evolution and antibody responses, Cao has made significant contributions to understanding humoral immunity and developing antibody therapeutics.[3][4]His research focuses on B-cell mediated adaptive immune response, antibody drugs, and vaccine design.[5] Cao gained international recognition for his ability to predict SARS-CoV-2 mutations and was named one of Nature's "Ten People Who Mattered" in 2022 for his role in tracking the evolution of the virus.[6] He was also listed as one of the "Innovators under 35" by the MIT Technology Review in 2021.[7]
MIT_2021
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
This submission has now been cleaned of the above-noted copyright violation and its history redacted by an administrator to remove the infringement. If re-submitted (and subsequent additions do not reintroduce copyright problems), the content may be assessed on other grounds.