 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2024) |
 | This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (October 2024) |
Electoralism is a term first used by Terry Karl, professor of political science at Stanford University, to describe a "half-way" transition from authoritarian rule toward democratic rule.
As a topic in the dominant party system political science literature, electoralism describes a situation where the transition out of hard-authoritarian rule is initiated and managed by the incumbent regime. However, due to the dominant position of the incumbent regime throughout the transition process, the transition fails to attain the institutional qualities of liberal democracy. Other terms, such as guided transition or managed transition have been used to describe this process.
Under electoralism, the regime essentially conducts the electoral aspects of democratic governance in a relatively 'free and fair' manner. Massive acts of voting fraud and election-day intimidation are essentially absent. However, other features of democracy, such as the rule of law and institutional separation of powers, are absent under electoralism. The entire election process is skewed in favor of the incumbent regime. The media tends to ignore or paint the opposition in a negative light, the high court and election commission tends to make judgements in favor of the incumbent, and on some occasions, opposition rallies are denied or canceled by the police.
Some examples include:
- Tanzania after 1992
- Turkey after 2002
- Kenya after 1991
- Mexico between the late 1980s and 2000.
- Russian Federation after 1991[1]
- ^ Rose, Richard & Munro, Neil: Elections Without Order Cambridge University Press, 2002 (p. 42)