Environmental racism in the United States

Part of a series on
Environmental justice
Key topics Climate change effects poverty litigation Climate crisis debt justice reparations resilience Corporate accountability Corporate crime Corporate environmental responsibility Energy democracy Environmental conflict crime inequality in the UK injustice in Europe justice racism racism in the USA racism in Western Europe Rights Amendments List of environmental conflicts Urban forest inequity
Academia Decolonization of knowledge Human geography Ecological economics Environmental Justice Atlas Environmental sociology Political ecology Social ecology Scholars: Robert Bullard Dina Gilio-Whitaker Joan Martinez Alier Kyle Powys Whyte Dorceta Taylor
By region Africa Europe Western Europe Central and Eastern Europe Russia United Kingdom United States US-Mexico border
Related topics Blockadia Climate finance Corporate accountability for human rights violations Corporate social responsibility Decolonization Desertification Electronic waste Environmental defender Water protector Land defender Environmentalism of the poor Environmentalism Environmental law Extractivism Global waste trade Green imperialism Human rights and climate change Impact investing List of environmental killings Locally unwanted land use Rights of nature Sacrifice zone Stewardship Sumak Kawsay Toxic colonialism Water conflict Zapatismo
Category
v t e

Environmental racism is a form of institutional racism, in which people of colour bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms, such as pollution from hazardous waste disposal and the effects of natural disasters.^[1][2][3] Environmental racism exposes Native Americans, African Americans, Asian Americans, Pacific Islanders, and Hispanic populations to physical health hazards and may negatively impact mental health.^[4] It creates disparities in many different spheres of life, such as transportation, housing, and economic opportunity.^[5]

Communities of color are more likely to be located next to pollution sources, such as landfills, power plants, and incinerators. There is evidence that exposure to pollution can result in a higher prevalence of disease.^[6] Additionally, low-income communities of color are more likely to have polluted water. An analysis of EPA data found that unequal access to safe drinking water is strongly correlated with race.^[7] The most polluted communities tend to be those with high poverty, inadequate infrastructure, substandard schools, chronic unemployment, and poor healthcare systems.^[8] Empirical evidence suggests environmental hazards negatively affect nearby property values, employment opportunities, and economic activities. In addition, environmental hazards can cause psychological stress.^{[9][10][11][12]}

Natural disasters also tend to have unequal impacts on communities of color. The extent of poverty within a region can often have a much stronger effect on the scale of a natural disaster's impact than the severity of the disaster itself.^[13] Affluent, white communities tend to be located on higher ground, so they are less vulnerable to floods than communities of color. Moreover, disaster prevention and recovery plans are often biased against minorities in low-income areas.^[14]