Estelle v. Smith | |
---|---|
Argued October 8, 1980 Decided May 18, 1981 | |
Full case name | Estelle, Corrections Director v. Ernest Benjamin Smith |
Citations | 451 U.S. 454 (more) 101 S. Ct. 1866; 68 L. Ed. 2d 359; 1981 U.S. LEXIS 95; 49 U.S.L.W. 4490 |
Case history | |
Prior | Certiorari to the Federal District Court of Appeals |
Holding | |
"An accused who neither initiates a psychiatric evaluation nor attempts to introduce any psychiatric evidence may not be compelled to respond to a psychiatrist if his statements can be used against him at a capital sentencing proceeding." | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Burger, joined by Brennan, White, Blackmun, Stevens; Marshall (all but part II-C) |
Concurrence | Brennan |
Concurrence | Marshall |
Concurrence | Stewart, joined by Powell |
Concurrence | Rehnquist |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amends. V, VI |
Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, per Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the state may not force a defendant to submit to a psychiatric examination solely for the purposes of sentencing. Any such examination violates the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination as well as the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, and is therefore inadmissible at sentencing.[1]