Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. | |
---|---|
Argued March 17–18, 1910 Reargued January 17–19, 1911 Decided March 13, 1911 | |
Full case name | Stella P. Flint, as General Guardian of the Property of Samuel N. Stone, Junior, a Minor, Appt. v. Stone Tracy Company, et al. |
Citations | 220 U.S. 107 (more) 31 S. Ct. 342; 55 L. Ed. 389; 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1664 |
Holding | |
The privilege of operating in corporate form is valuable and justifies imposition of an income tax. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Day, joined by White, McKenna, Holmes, Lurton, Hughes, Lamar. |
Dissent | Harlan, joined by Van Devanter |
Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court case in which a taxpayer challenged the validity of a federal income tax on corporations.[1] The privilege of incorporation is a state function, and the challengers argued that only the states should tax corporations. The Court ruled that the privilege of operating in corporate form is valuable and justifies imposition of a federal income tax: