Florida v. Jimeno | |
---|---|
Argued March 25, 1991 Decided May 23, 1991 | |
Full case name | Florida v. Enio Jimeno |
Citations | 500 U.S. 248 (more) 111 S. Ct. 1801; 114 L. Ed. 2d 297 |
Holding | |
Jimeno's consent to the search of the car did extend to the closed paper bag within the car, and did not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable searches. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by White, Blackmun, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter |
Dissent | Marshall, joined by Stevens |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. IV |
Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248 (1991), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the exclusionary rule of evidence under the Fourth Amendment.[1][2]