Golan v. Saada

Golan v. Saada
Argued March 22, 2022
Decided June 15, 2022
Full case nameNarkis Aliza Golan v. Isacco Jacky Saada
Docket no.20-1034
Citations596 U.S. ___ (more)
ArgumentOral argument
Holding
A court is not categorically required to examine all possible ameliorative measures before denying a Hague Convention petition for return of a child to a foreign country once the court has found that return would expose the child to a grave risk of harm.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinion
MajoritySotomayor, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction

Golan v. Saada, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The case reviewed if all ameliorative measures must be taken into consideration before denying a Hague Convention petition once it is found that the child could face harm when returned to a foreign country.[1]

  1. ^ "Golan v. Saada". Ballotpedia. Retrieved July 20, 2022.