Gold-plating (EU law)

Gold-plating is a term used to characterise the process whereby the powers of an EU directive are extended when being transposed into the national laws of a member state.[1][2][3]

In an operational study relating to the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, the European Commission treats gold-plating as a source of interference with policy outcomes, defining gold-plating as "an excess of norms, guidelines and procedures accumulated at national, regional and local levels, which interfere with the expected policy goals to be achieved by such regulation".[1] Business lobbyists generally argue against gold-plating, because additional regulation tends to raise costs for businesses,[4] but there are a few companies who stand to benefit from it.[5]

In case of gold-plating, the European Court of Justice does in fact have jurisdiction to interpret EU law, even if the case at hand is not directly governed by EU law.[6]

  1. ^ a b Mateo Boci; Jan Marten De Vet; Andreas Pauer (February 2014). 'Gold-plating' in the EAFRD: To what extent do national rules unnecessarily add to complexity and, as a result, increase the risk of errors? (PDF) (IP/D/AL/FWC/209-056 ed.). Brussels: Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the Union.
  2. ^ "Compliance, Transposition and Gold-Plating". Policy@Manchester. University of Manchester. Archived from the original on 6 October 2014. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
  3. ^ "Better Regulation: Simplification". European Commission. Archived from the original on 8 May 2008. Retrieved 13 August 2008.
  4. ^ "Tories pledge to cut EU red tape". BBC News. 18 August 2004. Retrieved 13 August 2008.
  5. ^ Frank Frick (9 July 2006), "Erhebliche Kosten, aber keine 'Vergoldung' bei EU-Richtlinien", Bertelsmann Stiftung
  6. ^ ECJ, judgment of 17 July 1997, nr. C-28/95, Leur-Bloem, paragraphs 16-34.