Goldberg v. Kelly | |
---|---|
Argued October 13, 1969 Decided March 23, 1970 | |
Full case name | Goldberg, Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York v. Kelly, et al. |
Citations | 397 U.S. 254 (more) 90 S. Ct. 1011; 25 L. Ed. 2d 287; 1970 U.S. LEXIS 80 |
Case history | |
Prior | Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Kelly v. Wyman, 294 F. Supp. 893 (S.D.N.Y. 1969); probable jurisdiction noted, 394 U.S. 971 (1969). |
Holding | |
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires a full evidentiary hearing before a recipient of certain government benefits is deprived of such benefits. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Brennan, joined by Douglas, Harlan, White, Marshall |
Dissent | Burger |
Dissent | Black |
Dissent | Stewart |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XIV |
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires an evidentiary hearing before a recipient of certain government welfare benefits can be deprived of such benefits.[1][2]
The individual losing benefits is entitled to an oral hearing before an impartial decision-maker as well as the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses and the right to a written statement setting out the evidence relied upon and the legal basis for the decision.[3] There is no right to a formal trial. The case was decided 5–3. (There was a vacancy on the Court because of the resignation of Abe Fortas.) Goldberg v. Kelly, Shapiro v. Thompson, and King v. Smith were a part of the set of successful Supreme Court cases that dealt with Welfare, specifically referred to as a part of 'The Welfare Cases'. [4]
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link)