Goldman v. Weinberger | |
---|---|
Argued January 14, 1986 Decided March 25, 1986 | |
Full case name | S. Simcha Goldman v. Weinberger, Secretary of Defense, et al. |
Citations | 475 U.S. 503 (more) 106 S. Ct. 1310; 89 L. Ed. 2d 478; 1986 U.S. LEXIS 34; 54 U.S.L.W. 4298; 40 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 543; 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) ¶ 35,947 |
Holding | |
The Free Exercise Clause does not protect religious apparel from military uniform regulations. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by Burger, White, Powell, Stevens |
Concurrence | Stevens, joined by White, Powell |
Dissent | Brennan, joined by Marshall |
Dissent | Blackmun |
Dissent | O'Connor, joined by Marshall |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. I | |
Superseded by | |
National Defense Authorization Act of 1988 |
Goldman v. Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case in which a Jewish Air Force officer was denied the right to wear a yarmulke when in uniform on the grounds that the Free Exercise Clause applies less strictly to the military than to ordinary citizens.