Gonzaga University v. Doe | |
---|---|
Argued April 24, 2002 Decided June 20, 2002 | |
Full case name | Gonzaga University and Roberta S. League, Petitioners v. John Doe |
Docket no. | 01-679 |
Citations | 536 U.S. 273 (more) 122 S. Ct. 2268; 153 L. Ed. 2d 309; 2002 U.S. LEXIS 4649; 70 U.S.L.W. 4577; 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5458; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 6859; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 436 |
Case history | |
Prior | On writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington. Doe v. Gonzaga Univ., 143 Wn.2d 687, 24 P.3d 390, 2001 Wash. LEXIS 381 (2001) |
Holding | |
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act's nondisclosure provisions created no personal rights to enforce under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas |
Concurrence | Breyer (in judgment), joined by Souter |
Dissent | Stevens, joined by Ginsburg |
Laws applied | |
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Gonzaga University v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, which prohibits the federal government from funding educational institutions that release education records to unauthorized persons, does not create a right which is enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.[1]