Greenlaw v. United States | |
---|---|
Argued April 15, 2008 Decided June 23, 2008 | |
Full case name | Michael Greenlaw, aka Mikey, Petitioner v. United States |
Docket no. | 07-330 |
Citations | 554 U.S. 237 (more) 128 S. Ct. 2559; 171 L. Ed. 2d 399; 2008 U.S. LEXIS 5259; 76 U.S.L.W. 4533; 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 421 |
Decision | Opinion |
Case history | |
Prior | 481 F.3d 601 (8th Cir. 2007); cert. granted, 552 U.S. 1087 (2008). |
Holding | |
A federal appeals court may not sua sponte increase a criminal sentence in the absence of an appeal filed by the government. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas |
Concurrence | Breyer (in judgment) |
Dissent | Alito, joined by Stevens; Breyer (Parts I, II, and III) |
Laws applied | |
18 U.S.C. § 3742; Fed. R. App. P. 3, 4, 26 |
Greenlaw v. United States, 554 U.S. 237 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a federal appeals court may not sua sponte increase a defendant's sentence unless the government first files a notice of appeal.[1]