Hannibal Directive

In 2016, the Hannibal Directive was revoked by then–IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eizenkot.
Then–IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz (right) in a training exercise where the forces practiced a soldier abduction scenario. Addressing the IDF's operations forum, Gantz stated that IDF protocols do not allow for a soldier to be killed in order to prevent his abduction.[1]

The Hannibal Directive (Hebrew: נוהל חניבעל, romanizedNóhal Khanibaál), also translated as Hannibal Procedure or Hannibal Protocol, is the name of a controversial procedure used by Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers by enemy forces. According to one version, it says that "the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces."[2] It was introduced in 1986, after a number of abductions of IDF soldiers in Lebanon and subsequent controversial prisoner exchanges. The full text of the directive was never published, and until 2003, Israeli military censorship forbade any discussion of the subject in the press. The directive has been changed several times,[2] and in 2016 Gadi Eizenkot ordered the formal revocation of the standing directive and the reformulation of the protocol.[3][4]

Two versions of the Hannibal Directive may have existed simultaneously at times: a written version, accessible only to the upper echelon of the IDF, and an "oral law" version for division commanders and lower levels. In the latter version, "by all means" was often interpreted literally, as in "an IDF soldier was 'better dead than abducted'". In 2011, IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz stated the directive does not permit killing IDF soldiers to prevent abduction.[5]

In case of the abduction of Gilad Shalit, invocation of the Hannibal Directive occurred too late to have any influence on the course of events.

Israeli newspapers have pointed out that during the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel the IDF was issued orders echoing the wording of the Hannibal Directive. The IDF was ordered to prevent "at all costs" the abduction of Israeli civilians or soldiers, possibly leading to the death of a large number of Israeli hostages.[6][7][8][9]

  1. ^ Harel, Amos. After Shalit, some IDF officers see a dead soldier as better than abducted, Haaretz. 2011
  2. ^ a b Weizman, Eyal (2017). Forensic Architecture, Violence at the Threshold of Detectability. New York: Zone Books. ISBN 9781935408864., page 176.
  3. ^ Harel, Amos. "Israel's Military Chief Orders to Revoke Controversial 'Hannibal' Directive". Haaretz. Retrieved 3 November 2023.
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference nytimesrevoked was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Amos Harel (2011). "Haaretz, Chief of Staff to Military Commanders: Hannibal Directive Does Not Permit Killing of Soldiers to Prevent Abduction".
  6. ^ Limone, Noa (2023-12-13). "If Israel Used a Controversial Procedure Against Its Citizens, We Need to Talk About It Now". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 2023-12-21. Retrieved 2024-01-16.
  7. ^ Cite error: The named reference :5 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  8. ^ Cite error: The named reference Ynet240111 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  9. ^ "Israel ordered 'Hannibal Procedure' on Oct. 7: Report". Anadolu Agency. 2024-01-12. Retrieved 2024-07-12.