Hess v. Pawloski | |
---|---|
Argued April 18, 1927 Decided May 16, 1927 | |
Full case name | Hess v. Pawloski |
Citations | 274 U.S. 352 (more) 47 S.Ct. 632; 71 L. Ed. 1091; 1927 U.S. LEXIS 34 |
Case history | |
Prior | Denial of motion to dismiss affirmed, 250 Mass. 22, 144 N.E. 760, 35 A.L.R. 945 (Mass. 1924). Defendant's exceptions overruled, 253 Mass. 478, 149 N.E. 122 (Mass. 1925). Trial court then entered judgment for the plaintiff. |
Holding | |
A statute appointing an agent for service of process for non-resident motorists involved in accidents while in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts complies with the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Butler, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
M.G.L.A. c.90 amended St.Mass 1923, c. 431, Sec. 2; U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 14. |
Hess v. Pawloski, 274 U.S. 352 (1927), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a statute designating the Massachusetts registrar of motor vehicles as agent for purpose of service of process for out-of-state non-resident motorists complies with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.[1]