History of learning to read

The history of learning to read dates back to the invention of writing during the 4th millennium BC.[1]

Concerning the English language in the United States, the phonics principle of teaching reading was first presented by John Hart in 1570, who suggested the teaching of reading should focus on the relationship between what is now referred to as graphemes (letters) and phonemes (sounds).[2]

In the colonial times of the United States, reading material was not written specifically for children, so instruction material consisted primarily of the Bible and some patriotic essays. The most influential early textbook was The New England Primer, published in 1687. There was little consideration given to the best ways to teach reading or assess reading comprehension.[3][4]

Phonics was a popular way to learn reading in the 1800s. William Holmes McGuffey (1800–1873), an American educator, author, and Presbyterian minister who had a lifelong interest in teaching children, compiled the first four of the McGuffey Readers in 1836.[5]

The whole-word method was introduced into the English-speaking world by Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet, the director of the American School for the Deaf.[6] It was designed to educate deaf people by placing a word alongside a picture.[7] In 1830, Gallaudet described his method of teaching children to recognize a total of 50 sight words written on cards.[8][9] Horace Mann, the Secretary of the Board of Education of Massachusetts, U.S., favored the method for everyone, and by 1837 the method was adopted by the Boston Primary School Committee.[10]

By 1844 the defects of the whole-word method became so apparent to Boston schoolmasters that they urged the Board to return to phonics.[11] In 1929, Samuel Orton, a neuropathologist in Iowa, concluded that the cause of children's reading problems was the new sight method of reading. His findings were published in the February 1929 issue of the Journal of Educational Psychology in the article "The Sight Reading Method of Teaching Reading as a Source of Reading Disability".[12]

The meaning-based curriculum came to dominate reading instruction by the second quarter of the 20th century. In the 1930s and 1940s, reading programs became very focused on comprehension and taught children to read whole words by sight. Phonics was taught as a last resort.[3]

Edward William Dolch developed his list of sight words in 1936 by studying the most frequently occurring words in children's books of that era. Children are encouraged to memorize the words with the idea that it will help them read more fluently. Many teachers continue to use this list, although some researchers consider the theory of sight word reading to be a "myth". Researchers and literacy organizations suggest it would be more effective if students learned the words using a phonics approach.[13][14]

In 1955, Rudolf Flesch published a book entitled Why Johnny Can't Read, a passionate argument in favor of teaching children to read using phonics, adding to the reading debate among educators, researchers, and parents.[15]

An American girl reading a newspaper (1969)

Government-funded research on reading instruction in the United States and elsewhere began in the 1960s. In the 1970s and 1980s, researchers began publishing studies with evidence on the effectiveness of different instructional approaches. During this time, researchers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) conducted studies that showed early reading acquisition depends on the understanding of the connection between sounds and letters (i.e. phonics). However, this appears to have had little effect on educational practices in public schools.[16][17]

In the 1970s, the whole language method was introduced. This method de-emphasizes the teaching of phonics out of context (e.g. reading books), and is intended to help readers "guess" the right word.[18] It teaches that guessing individual words should involve three systems (letter clues, meaning clues from context, and the syntactical structure of the sentence). It became the primary method of reading instruction in the 1980s and 1990s. However, it is falling out of favor. The neuroscientist Mark Seidenberg refers to it as a "theoretical zombie" because it persists despite a lack of supporting evidence.[19] It is still widely practiced in related methods such as sight words, the three-cueing system and balanced literacy.[20][16][21]

In the 1980s the three-cueing system (the searchlights model in England) emerged. According to a 2010 survey 75% of teachers in the United States teach the three-cueing system.[22] It teaches children to guess a word by using "meaning cues" (semantic, syntactic and graphophonic). While the system does help students to "make better guesses", it does not help when the words become more sophisticated; and it reduces the amount of practice time available to learn essential decoding skills. Consequently, present-day researchers such as cognitive neuroscientists Mark Seidenberg and professor Timothy Shanahan do not support the theory.[23][24] name="Dr Kerry Hempenstall, Senior Industry Fellow, School of Education, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia"/> In England, synthetic phonics is intended to replace "the searchlights multi-cueing model".[25][26]

In the 1990s Balanced literacy arose. It is a theory of teaching reading and writing that is not clearly defined. It may include elements such as word study and phonics mini-lessons, differentiated learning, cueing, leveled reading, shared reading, guided reading, independent reading and sight words.[27][28] For some, balanced literacy strikes a balance between whole language and phonics. Others say balanced literacy in practice usually means the whole language approach to reading.[29] According to a survey in 2010, 68% of K–2 teachers in the United States practice balanced literacy. Furthermore, only 52% of teachers included phonics in their definition of balanced literacy.[30]

In 1996 the California Department of Education took an increased interest in using phonics in schools.[31] And in 1997 the department called for grade one teaching in concepts about print, phonemic awareness, decoding and word recognition, and vocabulary and concept development.[32]

By 1998 in the U.K. whole language instruction and the searchlights model were still the norm; however, there was some attention to teaching phonics in the early grades, as seen in the National Literacy Strategies.[33][34]

  1. ^ "British Library". www.bl.uk. Archived from the original on 2022-03-11. Retrieved 2021-02-10.
  2. ^ Hart, John (1570). A method or comfortable beginning for all unlearned, whereby they may be taught to read English in a very short time, with pleasure: so profitable as strange, put in light, by I.H. Chester Heralt.
  3. ^ a b Adams, Marilyn Jager (1990). Beginning to read: thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 21–25. ISBN 0-262-01112-3. OCLC 256731826.
  4. ^ Glavin, Chris (2014-02-06). "History of Reading Education in the U.S. | K12 Academics". www.k12academics.com. Retrieved 2018-06-15.
  5. ^ William McGuffey (1999). McGuffey's Eclectic Primer. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-29428-4.
  6. ^ Gallaudet, Thomas Hopkins (1835). The Mother's Primer to Teacher Her Child Its Letters, and How to Read (PDF). Hartford, Connecticut: Daniel Burgess & Co.
  7. ^ Gallaudet, Thomas Hopkins (1830). The child's picture defining and reading book. Hartford, Connecticut: H. & F.J. Huntington.
  8. ^ "Sight Words Teaching Strategy | Sight Words: Teach Your Child to Read". www.sightwords.com. 12 November 2013. Retrieved 2018-06-15.
  9. ^ "Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet American Sign Language (ASL)". www.lifeprint.com. Retrieved 2018-06-15.
  10. ^ "PBS Online: Only A Teacher: Schoolhouse Pioneers". www.pbs.org. Retrieved 2018-06-15.
  11. ^ T. H. Gallaudet (1844). "The First Step in the Destruction of America's Early Reading Supremacy" (PDF). Don Potter. pp. 49–78. Retrieved 2022-10-25.
  12. ^ Glavin, Chris (2014-02-06). "Instructional Methods | K12 Academics". www.k12academics.com. Retrieved 2020-06-12.
  13. ^ "Literacy Strategy: How to Teach Sight Words". www.understood.org. 16 December 2019.
  14. ^ "A New Model for Teaching High-Frequency Words, reading rockets.org". 6 June 2019.
  15. ^ Flesch, Rudolf Franz (1986). Why Johnny can't read: and what you can do about it. San Francisco: Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-091340-1. OCLC 12837722.
  16. ^ a b Adams, Marilyn Jager (1994). Beginning to read: thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-51076-6. OCLC 256731826.
  17. ^ James S. Kim. Research and the Reading Wars, When Research Matters (PDF). p. 89. Retrieved 2021-03-07.
  18. ^ Goodman, Kenneth S. (1967). "A psycholinguistic guessing game". Journal of the Reading Specialist. 6 (4): 126–135. doi:10.1080/19388076709556976.
  19. ^ Seidenberg, Mark (2017). Language at the speed of sight. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 978-1-5416-1715-5.
  20. ^ Hanford, Emily. "Why aren't kids being taught to read?". www.apmreports.org.
  21. ^ Moats, Louisa. "Whole Language Lives On: The Illusion of Balanced Reading Instruction". LD Online. WETA Public Television. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
  22. ^ Sarah Schwartz, education week (December 16, 2020). "Is this the end of three cueing".
  23. ^ "Is it a Good Idea to Teach the Three Cueing Systems in Reading?, Timothy Shanahan, Reading Rockets, 2019-04-01". April 2019.
  24. ^ Mark Seidenberg (2017). Language at the speed of light. Basic Books. pp. 300–304. ISBN 978-0-465-08065-6.
  25. ^ "Primary Framework for literacy and mathematics, Department for education and skills, England" (PDF). 2006. p. 18. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 28, 2013.
  26. ^ Rose, Jim (2006). "Independent review of the teaching of early reading" (PDF). Department for Education and Skills. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-03-21. Retrieved 2011-08-24.
  27. ^ Zammit, Katina (11 November 2019). "Reading is more than sounding out words and decoding. That's why we use the whole language approach to teaching it". The Conversation.
  28. ^ "4 reasons to use balanced literacy". 27 May 2021.
  29. ^ Reading at the Speed of Light: How we Read, why so many can't, and what can be done about it, 2017, p. 248, Mark Seidenberg ISBN 978-1-5416-1715-5
  30. ^ Sarah Schwartz, education week (December 16, 2020). "Is this the end of three cueing".
  31. ^ "California Leads Revival Of Teaching by Phonics". The New York Times. 22 May 1996.
  32. ^ "English–Language Arts Content Standards for California Public Schools" (PDF).
  33. ^ "Phonics Developments in England from 1998 to 2018 by Jenny Chew, Reading reform foundation UK". 2018.
  34. ^ "The National Strategies 1997–2011, Department for Education, England" (PDF). 2011.