Illinois v. Lidster | |
---|---|
Argued November 5, 2003 Decided January 13, 2004 | |
Full case name | People of the State of Illinois v. Robert Lidster |
Citations | 540 U.S. 419 (more) 124 S. Ct. 885; 157 L. Ed. 2d 843 |
Case history | |
Prior | Evidence supporting conviction suppressed by the Illinois Supreme Court, 779 N.E.2d 855 (Ill. 2002) |
Holding | |
The Fourth Amendment does not forbid the use of a checkpoint to investigate a traffic incident. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Breyer, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas |
Concur/dissent | Stevens, joined by Souter, Ginsburg |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. IV |
Illinois v. Lidster, 540 U.S. 419 (2004), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Fourth Amendment permits the police to use a roadblock to investigate a traffic incident.