Imperial feminism

Imperial feminism, also known as imperialist feminism, colonial feminism, or intersectional imperialism, refers to instances where critics argue that feminist rhetoric is used to justify empire-building or imperialism.[1][2] The term has gained prominence in the 20th and 21st centuries, with one scholar asserting that it "privileges inequality through gender bending that masquerades as gendered equality... Imperial feminism privileges empire building through war."[3] The related term intersectional imperialism refers to the foreign policy of Western nations that are perceived as engaging in or supporting imperialistic policies while promoting inclusive and progressive rhetoric at home.[4]

In academia and women's studies discourse, imperial feminism and its related terms critique Western feminism's attitudes toward non-white and non-Western countries. Critics argue that it perpetuates inaccurate and demeaning stereotypes about the status of women in the Global South. Western feminism has been critiqued for creating an image of non-white and non-Western women as being in a lower socioeconomic position than they actually are. Additionally, "imperial feminism" is used to describe instances where racist viewpoints are displayed toward marginalized ethnic groups not part of mainstream feminism. Some scholars suggest that postcolonial feminism developed partly in response to these attitudes from their Western counterparts.[2]

  1. ^ Gender, Sexuality, and Empire: Imperialist Feminism in Culture, retrieved 2020-08-11
  2. ^ a b Amos, Valerie; Parmar, Pratibha (1984). "Challenging Imperial Feminism". Feminist Review (17): 3–19. doi:10.2307/1395006. ISSN 0141-7789. JSTOR 1395006.
  3. ^ "Hillary Clinton's Imperial Feminism". The Cairo Review of Global Affairs. 2016-10-23. Retrieved 2020-10-21.
  4. ^ Engler, Yves (19 August 2020). "Trudeau's Venezuela policy is a stain on Canada's global reputation". Canadian Dimension.