John McDowell | |
---|---|
Born | John Henry McDowell 7 March 1942[7] |
Alma mater | University College of Rhodesia and Nyasaland (as issued by University of London) New College, Oxford |
Era | 20th-century philosophy |
Region | Western philosophy |
School | Postanalytic philosophy Pittsburgh School Disjunctivism Foundationalism[1][2] Perceptual conceptualism[3] Direct realism[4][2] The New Wittgenstein Aristotelian ethics Hegelianism |
Doctoral students | Anita Avramides, Alice Crary |
Other notable students | Sebastian Rödl |
Main interests | Metaphysics, epistemology, logic, philosophy of language, philosophy of perception, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of mind, ethics, meta-ethics |
Notable ideas | Perceptual conceptualism[3] naturalized Platonism,[5] moral particularism,[6] disjunctivism |
John Henry McDowell FBA (born 7 March 1942) is a South African philosopher, formerly a fellow of University College, Oxford, and now university professor at the University of Pittsburgh. Although he has written on metaphysics, epistemology, ancient philosophy, nature, and meta-ethics, McDowell's most influential work has been in the philosophy of mind and philosophy of language. McDowell was one of three recipients of the 2010 Andrew W. Mellon Foundation's Distinguished Achievement Award,[8] and is a Fellow of both the American Academy of Arts & Sciences and the British Academy.
McDowell has, throughout his career, understood philosophy to be "therapeutic" and thereby to "leave everything as it is" (Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations), which he understands to be a form of philosophical quietism (although he does not consider himself to be a "quietist"). The philosophical quietist believes that philosophy cannot make any explanatory comment about how, for example, thought and talk relate to the world but can, by offering re-descriptions of philosophically problematic cases, return the confused philosopher to a state of intellectual perspicacity.
However, in defending this quietistic perspective McDowell has engaged with the work of leading contemporaries in such a way as to therapeutically dissolve what he takes to be philosophical error, while defending major positions and interpretations from major figures in philosophical history, and developing original and distinctive theses about language, mind and value. In each case, he has tried to resist the influence of what he regards as a scientistic, reductive form of philosophical naturalism that has become very commonplace in our historical moment, while nevertheless defending a form of "Aristotelian naturalism,[9]" bolstered by key insights from Hegel, Wittgenstein, and others.