Kennedy v. Bremerton School District | |
---|---|
Argued April 25, 2022 Decided June 27, 2022 | |
Full case name | Joseph A. Kennedy v. Bremerton School District |
Docket no. | 21-418 |
Citations | 597 U.S. 507 (more) 2022 WL 2295034; 2022 U.S. LEXIS 3218 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Decision | Opinion |
Case history | |
Prior |
|
Holding | |
The Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses of the First Amendment protect an individual engaging in a personal religious observance from government reprisal; the Constitution neither mandates nor permits the government to suppress such religious expression. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Gorsuch, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Barrett; Kavanaugh (except Part III–B) |
Concurrence | Thomas |
Concurrence | Alito |
Dissent | Sotomayor, joined by Breyer, Kagan |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. I |
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, 597 U.S. 507 (2022), is a landmark decision[1] by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held, 6–3, that the government, while following the Establishment Clause, may not suppress an individual from engaging in personal religious observance, as doing so would violate the Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment.
The case involved Joseph Kennedy, a high school football coach in the public school system of Bremerton, Washington. Kennedy had taken the practice of praying at the middle of the field immediately after each game. The players and others soon joined the practice. The school board were concerned the practice would be seen as violating the Establishment Clause separating church and state. They attempted to negotiate with Kennedy to pray elsewhere or at a later time, but Kennedy continued the practice. His contract was not renewed, leading Kennedy to sue the board. Lower Courts, including the Ninth Circuit, ruled in favor of the school board and their argument regarding the Establishment Clause.
The majority opinion from the Supreme Court held that the Establishment Clause does not allow a government body to take a hostile view of religion in considering personal rights under the Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses, and that the board acted improperly in not renewing Kennedy's contract. The decision all but overruled Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) and abandoned the "Lemon test", which had been used to evaluate government actions within the scope of the Establishment Clause but had been falling out of favor for decades prior.