| Ker v. California | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued December 11, 1962 Decided June 10, 1963 | |
| Full case name | Diane Ker, et. ux. v. California |
| Citations | 374 U.S. 23 (more) 83 S. Ct. 1623; 10 L. Ed. 2d 726; 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2473; 24 Ohio Op. 2d 201 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Cert. to the District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District |
| Holding | |
| The Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable search and seizure and the exclusionary rule for evidence obtained from unreasonable search and seizure apply to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Clark, joined by Black, Stewart, White |
| Concurrence | Harlan (in judgment) |
| Concur/dissent | Brennan, joined by Warren, Douglas, Goldberg |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amends. IV, XIV | |
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23 (1963), was a case before the United States Supreme Court, which incorporated the Fourth Amendment's protections against illegal search and seizure. The case was decided on June 10, 1963, by a vote of 5–4.