Largely debunked theories that aim to account for differences in individuals' learning
Learning styles refer to a range of theories that aim to account for differences in individuals' learning.[1] Although there is ample evidence that individuals express personal preferences on how they prefer to receive information,[2]: 108 few studies have found validity in using learning styles in education.[3]: 267 Many theories share the proposition that humans can be classified according to their "style" of learning, but differ on how the proposed styles should be defined, categorized and assessed.[1]: 8 A common concept is that individuals differ in how they learn.[3]: 266
The idea of individualized learning styles became popular in the 1970s. [4] This has greatly influenced education despite the criticism that the idea has received from some researchers.[2]: 107–108 Proponents recommend that teachers run a needs analysis to assess the learning styles of their students and adapt their classroom methods to best fit each student's learning style.[5] Critics claim that there is no consistent evidence that better student outcomes result from identifying an individual student's learning style and teaching for specific learning styles.[2][6]: 33 Since 2012, learning styles have often been referred to as a "neuromyth" in education,[7][8] which is believed by up to 89% of educators.[9] There is evidence of empirical and pedagogical problems related to forcing learning tasks to "correspond to differences in a one-to-one fashion".[10] Studies contradict the widespread "meshing hypothesis" that a student will learn best if taught in a method deemed appropriate for the student's learning style.[2]
Studies further show that teachers cannot assess the learning style of their students accurately.[11] In one study, students were asked to take an inventory of their learning styles. After nearly 400 students completed the inventory, 70% did not use study habits that matched their preferred learning method.[12] This study also indicated that students who used study methods that matched their preferred learning style performed no better on tests than students who did not.[12]
^In one extensive list of learning-styles instruments and theories (Coffield et al. 2004, pp. 166–169), the authors listed three works on learning styles before the 1950s, four from the 1950s, seven from the 1960s, 21 from the 1970s, 22 from the 1980s, and 17 from the 1990s.
^Pritchard, Alan (2014) [2005]. "Learning styles". Ways of learning: learning theories and learning styles in the classroom (3rd ed.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge. pp. 46–65. ISBN9780415834926. OCLC853494423.
^Blanchette Sarrasin, Jérémie; Masson, Steve (29 September 2015). "Neuromyths in Education". EdCan Network, Canadian Education Association. Retrieved 18 September 2020.
^Klein, Perry D. (January 2003). "Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: alternatives to 'learning styles' and 'multiple intelligences'". Journal of Curriculum Studies. 35 (1): 45–81. doi:10.1080/00220270210141891. S2CID144074203.