Lockhart v. Fretwell | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued November 3, 1992 Decided January 25, 1993 | |
Full case name | Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections v. Fretwell |
Citations | 506 U.S. 364 (more) 113 S. Ct. 838; 122 L. Ed. 2d 180 |
Case history | |
Prior | Fretwell v. Lockhart, 739 F. Supp. 1334 (E.D. Ark. 1990); affirmed in part, 946 F.2d 571 (8th Cir. 1991); cert. granted, 504 U.S. 908 (1992). |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by White, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas |
Concurrence | O'Connor |
Concurrence | Thomas |
Dissent | Stevens, joined by Blackmun |
Lockhart v. Fretwell, 506 U.S. 364 (1993), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court[1] which held that failure to make an objection under Collins v. Lockhart[2] did not constitute undue prejudice required by Strickland v. Washington,[3] because the error did not cause a fundamentally unfair trial, as opposed to merely a different outcome of the case.