Machaeroprosopus Temporal range: Late Triassic,
| |
---|---|
Skulls in New Mexico | |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Reptilia |
Clade: | Archosauromorpha |
Clade: | Archosauriformes |
Order: | †Phytosauria |
Family: | †Parasuchidae |
Tribe: | †Mystriosuchini |
Genus: | †Machaeroprosopus Mehl et al., 1916 [1] |
Type species | |
†Belodon buceros | |
Species | |
Synonyms | |
|
Machaeroprosopus (from Greek: μαχαίρα machaíra, 'large knife' and Greek: πρόσωπος prósōpos, 'bordering on')[6] is an extinct genus of mystriosuchin leptosuchomorph phytosaur from the Late Triassic of the southwestern United States. M. validus, once thought to be the type species of Machaeroprosopus, was named in 1916 on the basis of three complete skulls from Chinle Formation, Arizona. The skulls have been lost since the 1950s, and a line drawing in the original 1916 description is the only visual record of the specimen.[7] Another species, M. andersoni, was named in 1922 from New Mexico, and the species M. adamanensis, M. gregorii, M. lithodendrorum, M. tenuis, and M. zunii were named in 1930. Most species have been reassigned to the genera Smilosuchus,[8] Rutiodon, or Phytosaurus.[9] Until recently, M. validus was considered to be the only species that has not been reassigned. Thus, Machaeroprosopus was considered to be a nomen dubium or "doubtful name" because of the lack of diagnostic specimens that can support its distinction from other phytosaur genera. However, a taxonomic revision of Machaeroprosopus, conducted by Parker et al. in 2013, revealed that UW 3807, the holotype of M. validus, is not the holotype of Machaeroprosopus, while the species Machaeroprosopus buceros, Machaeroprosopus being a replacement name, with a fixed type species, for Metarhinus, is the combinatio nova of the type species of the genu: Belodon buceros. Therefore, the name Pseudopalatus must be considered a junior synonym of Machaeroprosopus, and all species of the former must be reassigned to the latter.[10] This revised taxonomy was already accepted in several studies, including Stocker and Butler (2013).[11] Stocker and Butler (2013) also treated M. andersoni as a valid species,[11] and not a junior synonym of Machaeroprosopus buceros as was previously suggested by Long and Murry (1995).[5]
Mehletal1916
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).ParkerIrmis06
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).M.lottorum
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).Ballew89
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).