Manson v. Brathwaite | |
---|---|
Argued November 29, 1976 Decided June 16, 1977 | |
Full case name | John R. Manson, Commissioner of Correction of Connecticut v. Nowell A. Brathwaite |
Citations | 432 U.S. 98 (more) 97 S.Ct. 2243 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Case history | |
Prior | 527 F.2d 363 (2d Cir. 1975) |
Questions presented | |
Do the 14th and 6th Amendments require the exclusion from a state criminal trial of pretrial identification evidence that is both suggestive and unnecessary? | |
Holding | |
No. The admission of the evidence did not violate the 14th Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Blackmun, joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens |
Concurrence | Stevens |
Dissent | Marshall, joined by Brennan |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XIV, U.S. Const. amend. VI |
Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 (1977) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1977.[1] The decision touched on the exclusionary rule in state criminal proceedings.[1]
The Supreme Court held that the identification procedures used against Brathwaite did not violate the Constitution of the United States.[1]