Maryland v. Craig | |
---|---|
Argued April 18, 1990 Decided June 27, 1990 | |
Full case name | Maryland v. Sandra A. Craig |
Citations | 497 U.S. 836 (more) 110 S. Ct. 3157; 111 L. Ed. 2d 666; 58 U.S.L.W. 5044; 1990 U.S. LEXIS 3457; 30 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (Callaghan) 1 |
Case history | |
Prior | Defendant convicted, Circuit Court of Howard County, 9-27-88; affirmed, 544 A.2d 784 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1988); reversed, 560 A.2d 1120 (Md. 1989); cert. granted, 493 U.S. 1041 (1990) |
Subsequent | New trial ordered, 588 A.2d 328 (Md. 1991) |
Holding | |
Testimony by an alleged child sex abuse victim via closed-circuit television did not violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, White, Blackmun, Kennedy |
Dissent | Scalia, joined by Brennan, Marshall, Stevens |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. VI |
Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the Sixth Amendment. The Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause, which provides criminal defendants with the right to confront witnesses against them, did not bar the use of one-way closed-circuit television to present testimony by an alleged child sex abuse victim.