McNeil v. Wisconsin | |
---|---|
Argued February 26, 1991 Decided June 13, 1991 | |
Full case name | Paul McNeil v. State of Wisconsin |
Citations | 501 U.S. 171 (more) 111 S. Ct. 2204; 115 L. Ed. 2d 158 |
Case history | |
Prior | Defendant was convicted of murder, and the conviction was affirmed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari. |
Holding | |
Invoking the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not implicitly invoke rights secured by Miranda v. Arizona. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, White, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter |
Concurrence | Kennedy |
Dissent | Stevens, joined by Marshall, Blackmun |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amends. V, VI |
McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171 (1991), held that the right to counsel secured by the Sixth Amendment and the right to counsel protected by Miranda v. Arizona[1] are separate and distinct, such that invoking one does not implicitly invoke the other.