McNeil v. Wisconsin

McNeil v. Wisconsin
Argued February 26, 1991
Decided June 13, 1991
Full case namePaul McNeil v. State of Wisconsin
Citations501 U.S. 171 (more)
111 S. Ct. 2204; 115 L. Ed. 2d 158
Case history
PriorDefendant was convicted of murder, and the conviction was affirmed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari.
Holding
Invoking the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not implicitly invoke rights secured by Miranda v. Arizona.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
Byron White · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun · John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · David Souter
Case opinions
MajorityScalia, joined by Rehnquist, White, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter
ConcurrenceKennedy
DissentStevens, joined by Marshall, Blackmun
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. V, VI

McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171 (1991), held that the right to counsel secured by the Sixth Amendment and the right to counsel protected by Miranda v. Arizona[1] are separate and distinct, such that invoking one does not implicitly invoke the other.