Menominee Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States | |
---|---|
Argued December 1, 2015 Decided January 25, 2016 | |
Full case name | Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin, Petitioner v. United States |
Docket no. | 14–510 |
Citations | 577 U.S. ___ (more) 136 S. Ct. 750; 193 L. Ed. 2d 652 |
Case history | |
Prior | Summary judgment granted, 841 F. Supp. 2d 99 (D.D.C. 2012); affirmed, 764 F.3d 51 (D.C. Cir. 2014); cert. granted, 135 S. Ct. 2927 (2015). |
Holding | |
Plaintiff was not entitled to equitable tolling because they did not demonstrate "extraordinary circumstances" | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Alito, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. § 7101 et seq., |
Menominee Tribe of Wis. v. United States, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States clarified when litigants are entitled to equitable tolling of a statute of limitations.[1] In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito, the Court held that the plaintiff in this case was not entitled to equitable tolling of the statute of limitations because they did not demonstrate that "extraordinary circumstances" prevented the timely filing of the lawsuit.[2]