Mere addition paradox

Part of a series on
Utilitarianism
Predecessors
Key proponents
Types of utilitarianism
Key concepts
Problems
Related topics
Philosophy portal

The mere addition paradox (also known as the repugnant conclusion) is a problem in ethics identified by Derek Parfit and discussed in his book Reasons and Persons (1984). The paradox identifies the mutual incompatibility of four intuitively compelling assertions about the relative value of populations. Parfit’s original formulation of the repugnant conclusion is that "For any perfectly equal population with very high positive welfare, there is a population with very low positive welfare which is better, other things being equal."[1]

  1. ^ Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (Clarendon Press, 1984), p. 388.